CH. SARFRAZ AHMED versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 154, 63 and 13 (1) (a) constitute the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 v. XXV), signing the acknowledgment of the notice presented in the service of section 2 (3) (i) (nine) notices. Were different. The complainant's signature on the previous documents / returns was invalid because there was no evidence of proper service of any legal notice prior to its completion because of the ex parte assessment under section 13 (1) (a) of the Income Tax. The Constitution Ordinance, 1979, found such a corruption constituent and the matter came under the jurisdiction of the Federal Tax Ombudsman The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended that proceedings be made under Section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and the former Part Assessment of 1998 Cancel and re-designate the complainant after allowing the complainant a reasonable opportunity of hearing. r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
