Find a Lawyer

MAULANA QARI MUHAMMAD ARIF versus CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF

Article 199 Constitutional Appeal The appointment of a khateeb at the university mosque joined the department as a khateeb in the university mosque, however, after a few days the defendant was appointed as a khateeb applicant, thereby Had caused severe prejudice. The applicant had suspended that the order of appointment through constitutional application was related to two specific / separate cadre ie, the Masjid Establishment Cadre and the \ Aqaf Academy Establishment / the applicant since joining the AAQ. The Establishment was responding while the Respondent was concerned with the post of Af Aqaf Academy Establishment \ Khateeb and also the Jamia Mosque, which was a central place, was to be filled with the cadre of the Khateeb and not from the other cadre as per the rules in this post. There was a clear supply. Sermons will be full of those who serve a certain way if they need to do it in a certain way. Nor otherwise, when filling the vacancies, the appointment rules must be adhered to and if any appointment was made in violation of such rules, then this appointment is not a valid appointment in the eyes of the law. Could be understood. The Chief Administrator approached the interim, directing him to vacate the office of the Khateeb Mosque. Consider eligible cases, including a lawsuit on the applicant's own merits. And then this post should be filled within a specific time frame without any external pressure, and especially in a fair and transparent manner. \ r \ n family advocate from Leepa lawyer