Find a Lawyer

LEEMOONMAL versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 58 (1), 59, 61, 62, 63 and 129 of the Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001), Section 122A Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 of XXV 2000), Sections 2 (3) and 9 (2) ( b) Under the Self Assessment Scheme, the complainant complained of non-acceptance of their return of income for the assessment years (2000 2001), (2001 02), (2002-03) and the Ombudsman's Department for rigorous evaluation. Initial objections to the option were raised as the complaint was made on the visible and factual basis that the return of the complainant through random balloting of the computer was selected for total audit. The notice was issued for filing of financial statements, trading and filing of profit and loss account. The complainant failed to produce the required documents which resulted in the examination of the previous section and successfully returned the year. Fifty rupees were filed announcing lower income of Rs. The allegations of qualification and corruption for the self-diagnosis scheme were not correct. The return of the rules was strictly selected under the Central Board of Revenue's Circular Self Assessment Scheme for the year under consideration. Legal Notices No Corruption Establishment Returns for 2001 were filed on 2001-11 2001 and the income declared was lower than the income from the previous year, which according to the Board of Directors of Self Assessment returns eligible for the Return Assessment Scheme. was not. The Scheme Assessment made for the year 2002 to 2002 contained a tampering and obstruction order sheet. Assessment year 2002 2003 was vacant No diagnostic order was present. Presented this how to become a advocate from Jehlum lawyer