Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of Articles 158 (1) (89) and 168 of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Sections 9 and 11 confiscate and confiscate weapons alleged to be illegal, even though the complainant was acquitted. Refusal to leave Authorized prosecution as a reference to the FIR was foreign, with both weapons and smuggling charges due to non-production of expert evidence related to the origin of the weapon by the prosecution, according to the expert's opinion The prosecutor did not present expert evidence before the court. Presented and examined by expert witnesses, the decision in the cases before the Special Judge and the Judicial Magistrate varies, in which case, if the Adjudicating Officer adopts a different view from the Special Judge and the Judicial Magistrate's decision, Does not fall within the scope of the complaint. Had already filed an appeal, where he could finally suppress his objections to considering the Maldivian doctrine, before prosecutors and customs authorities for failing to present expert evidence with illegal, negligent and unlawful motive. Was nominated in connection with the action. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommended to the CBR to investigate the reasons for non-production of expert evidence before the court. The tax administration, which is responsible for such negligence and dishonesty, will instruct the appellate authority to prosecute them in accordance with the law. immigration advocates email from Sudhnoti lawyer