AMEER-E-HAMZA IMPEX, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
RR 4, 5 & 6 CBR Circular No. C2 (F) STP / 99 / PT, Date 1 1 2002 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of Office of Establishment (XXV of 2000), section 2 ( 3) It is not permissible to exclude the Supply Name from the suspected list for return claim till 9 and 11, it is not permissible to reject the refund claim, where some invoices were found to be fake or issued by the suspected supplier. In such cases, no refund claim will be allowed in the appropriate course. Regardless of the fact that the amount of genuine receipts forged and cleared was placed on the suspected list of the particular supplier where the appropriate buyer made the actual payment of the invoice value, including sales tax through the appropriate banking channel, then the sales tax to the government. The responsibility of the payment will be placed on the registered supplier. In case of failure to submit a sales tax, action should be taken against the registered supplier. The Department of Justice rejected jurisdiction and subsequent claims on irrelevant and unwarranted grounds. Such irrational and unjustified proceedings would prove to be a motivating and predetermined mind, transferring goods from the suppliers to the illicit Federal Tax Ombudsman. Will confirm to the Revenue the decision to make such a claim after confirmation. Confirmation of payment of cost of goods including transport documents, purchase notes, receipt notes, entry of buyer's account books, sales tax through banking channels and confirmation of delivery of goods to foreign buyers. n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
