Find a Lawyer

ISHTIAQ TEXTILE MILLS LTD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY FINANCE DIVISION

With Section 4 pay you apply the scheme rules, 1973, R4 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 34 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 and 55 suit declarations, injunctions and damages and It is charged a fine and interest. Due to the reduction in export revenue by the plaintiff, nothing was available from the records of an industrial unit authority claiming that the plaintiff / industrial unit could not then be fined in any case. The reasons for the reduction were not denied by the authorities / defendants, keeping in view all the facts and circumstances of the case to which it was interpreted and any scrutiny from the \ authorities \ record. The investigation was not targeted. The interest on the penalty amount, which, by itself, was illegal as the interest in the nature of the damages could not be imposed on the penalty amount tion34, CPC awarded the interest pendant award and the plaintiff from the date of the injunction For a long time he was deprived of his legitimate money and the court had to exercise discretion in his favor when the court was of the view that any public liabilities were declared by the party to be unreasonable. At the time of the disposal of this case, the proposed bank may order interest payments on the amount received at the rate of 2% of the rate, the plaintiff's suit is high. Court had ruled. From the date of interest against the authorities / defendants to the payment of expenses, with the annual interest rate of 9% annually, the High Court declared the rules of the scheme of earning you as salaries, 1973 extremely vires and granted powers. The excesses prevented the authorities from announcing immigration advocates contact from Gakhar Mandi lawyer