RAMSHI versus STATE
Section 2/2 / Pro 34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 1373, 190, 193 and 561A, in the unlikely event of the murder of a participant who is a co-accused, bringing the case to the prosecutor at home. Had to collect bits and pieces of evidence. The culprit involved in the crime When a magistrate confesses to the crime, he or she will confess to the crime as a whole and not only the police are found to be involved in the crime, which according to the court is investigated. All persons involved shall have jurisdiction and not only the persons against whom the challan was presented, the magistrate may, at his discretion, call any person named in the challan number 2 of the challan. Was submitted, the applicant was a person. , Who was specifically named in the complaint that defendant was involved in the murder of his daughter, was also supported by two prosecution witnesses during the investigation during the investigation. The case of the other accused was the same but in the statement under Section 164 Cr CCPC, the second accused, the son of the petitioner, had taken full responsibility for the murder of the victim and in this he was the sole involved. Had confessed to being. This offense will not mean that without further evidence being recorded, the trial court was not justified in approving the invalid order of joining the applicant as a participant in the crime.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Rohri lawyer