Find a Lawyer

MST. FAKHARUNNISA versus HASSAN ALI

Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OI, R 10 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition Required to Exclude a Tenant Controversy The former applicant was the wife of the landlord and claimed that she was the premier Is the owner and has a lawsuit against him. Her ex-husband (landlord) was pending before the civil court, the renter's controller dismissed the request to proceed with the party's dismissal and was retained by the lower appellate court. There was no case for interference in the search of the facts listed by the two courts below. The applicant had no place to file an appeal against the eviction order approved by the rental controller, which was not taken into account by the parties opposing the rental action; The payer filed an appeal in the lower appellate court claiming to be the owner of the premises, which was rightly dismissed. The court dismissed the constitutional plea in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2013

• FAYYAZ ALI v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Services, General Administration and Coordination Department, Ka 2013 PLC(CS) 592
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. State 2013 PCrLJ 600
• WASEEM YOUSUF v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LIMITED 2013 CLD 600
• LANDIRENZO PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2013 MLD 601
• Ch. FAZAL MUHAMMAD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Defence 2013 CLC 606
• NIB BANK LIMITED v. ALI HAMID TRAVELS 2013 CLD 613
• FAISAL NOOR v. REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI 2013 PLC(CS) 614
• AAMIR WAHEED v. Mrs. HALEEMA AKHTAR 2013 CLC 622

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2013 →

law firms from Thatta lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes