Find a Lawyer

SADAQAT ALI versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

Arts 199, 25 and 212 Constitution Petition Benefits of Civil Service Judicial Allowance Equality Before the law, an officer on the staff of the Advocate General's Office also said that the petitioner and his accompanying colleagues were discriminated against for no good reason. There has been a strong recommendation, especially from the administrative department, to extend the same benefit to the Attorney General's Office for Pakistan, and such action by all Pakistan's highest courts and officials has virtually offended Article 25 of the constitution. Which sought intervention of the High Court under Article 199. According to the constitution's justification, the applicant and his accomplices were being subjected to discrimination because similar employees were confessingly enjoying the benefits that the applicant and his associates were claiming, but they had no Article 25 of the law is guaranteed equality before law and uniform protection of law is being violated by the authorities in the present situation. On the use of discrimination, interference in situations and the use of judicial review options Stressed. Applicants and their colleagues working in the Office of the Advocate General claiming that they are entitled to relief may be allowed within a specified period. pakistani advocates Chak 4 b c lawyer