Find a Lawyer

FINE COTTON TEXTILES versus KHALED IBN AL WALEED THROUGH MASTER/CHIEF OFFICER

Section 3 (2) (b) Admiralty suit consignment was denied by the destination at the port; the shipowners / charters claimed the sabotage / storage charges but the plaintiff was unable to prove that it was What is more is that the transfer of goods from the port to the second port by the defendants was mainly due to the plaintiff's fault because it was the buyer's back, otherwise not all the events and since the real reason is with the claimant. , Therefore, the claim that damages / storage charges did not cause the plaintiffs to take action, although at one point, the case For the purpose of elimination / storage compensation, but in the absence of the recipient to deliver the goods to the port destination, the defendant's dual stance on self-defense again began to ask that there were no buyers and Secondly, that the goods were mistakenly transferred to another port, it is clear that they failed to provide the relevant dates. The defendants, in the circumstances, were not entitled to claim deduction / storage charges. best advocate from Gari Habibullah lawyer