Find a Lawyer

MISS ATTIYA SEHRAI versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES CORPORATION (PIAC) THROUGH CHAIRMAN

Section 2A & 4 Pakistan International Airlines Corporation (Suspension of Trade Unions and Existing Contracts) Order, 2001 [Chief Executive Order No. 6 of 2001], Article 4 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petition Service Tribunal Qualification Petitioner Appellant, a PIA employee performing his duties as an Airhostess, was discharged from his duties due to his contract not being extended in 2005, the Applicant has, through his Deputy Registrar, a service tribunal. Appeal filed before the service tribunal, demanding his dismissal, petitioner decided in the PLC (C section) of 1997 In view of 1316, his appeal was rejected. Authorities had pleaded that the service tribunal had no jurisdiction to handle the appeal and forwarding the matter to the service tribunal would, in turn, be a catastrophe. The notice to increase the service tribunal's jurisdiction justifies that the appeal filed by Pete was declared invalid by the registrar of the court, while the registrar has no authority to pass such order. Was. It was within the domain and authority of the service tribunal that the matter was resolved by passing a court order and the order of the deputy registrar was set aside without legal authority and the appeal filed by the applicant was pending before the service tribunal. Was declared. Who will decide the matter of mitigation after hearing the parties registration advocate from Kandiaro lawyer