INAM ALI BHATTI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 18A & 33 (I) Section RA No. 1198 (I) / 96, dated 22 10 1996 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of Office of Establishment (XXV of 2000), Sections 9 and 11 unlawfully imposed. Claims for return of shipment inspection charges Superior Courts dismissed allegations as illegal authority dismissed claims for return of such charges as timely ban without issuing show cause notice to complainant Where the money exported by the authority was not a customs duty / charge or there is no restriction under its enforcement and applicable law, then the claim Such refunds cannot be operated by Section 33 of the Customs Act, 1969. The amount of such charges does not belong to the government, therefore, the recovery of such charges was not supported by legal sanction and without Such a claim for a jurisdiction cannot be refunded if it is actually paid, by virtue of section 33 of the Customs Act, 1969, for bills of entry, duty, taxes and such No submitted symbol. Admissions are usually carried by the Treasury or bank deposit stamps, the refund will be on the proof of payment of such charges and along with the Chartered Accountant's Certificate confirming that such accusations did not pass on to the customer. Are. The Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 shall not fall into any of the cases listed in Section 9 (2) (b) of the Office, rejecting such claims on the basis of technical sanctions, unfair, Was unfair and discrimination was constituted a feeder
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
