Find a Lawyer

RANA ABDUL SHAKOOR KHAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance in Sections 50 (7E) (7H), 80C (3) and 143BCBR ular 1993, dated 13 10 1993 (XXV 2000). , Section 2 (3), 9 & 11, claiming tax refunds received by WAPDA due to power consumption, deciding on non-practicable claims of the department or earning it under the Complainants section ( Income Tax Ordinance, 50 (7H) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, shall be the final discharge of the obligation of this tax, in respect of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Supply of section 80C (3) Cannot be extended by WAPDA to cover such receipts under which it is declared non-refundable. Section 50 could not be withdrawn because the complainant's tax liability was eventually excluded because the tax deducted by WAPDA was more than the total amount due under section 80CB and Receipt will not be valid because of the deposit under Sec. on50 (7E) His department allowed a similar refund in another case, and his action was discriminated against and the department responded by requesting such a refund. Denial of this was disconnected and invalid. Instruct the competent authority to allow such return \ r \ n best law firm from Dargai lawyer