Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus FARRUKH CORPORATION THROUGH SOLE PROPRIETORY CONCERN'S LEGAL HEIRS

A. VIII, R2 LA Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Money Suite Recovery Joint Viability Proof Suite was filed by the plaintiff bank against its borrower and warehouse owner, with the borrower The stock pledged debt and bank auctions. The bank borrower's stock of complaints was that the owner of the warehouse failed to provide the full amount of stock associated with it, therefore, the bank suffered losses that would be shared by the borrower as well as the warehouse owner. The trial court ruled that the only case against the lenders in the bank's case was that both the defendants were jointly responsible for the losses incurred by the bank, therefore, this case was jointly against the two accused. , Which led to the legality of the trial court not verifying it. In its original context, evidence and wrongly found that the agreement between the plaintiff bank and the owner of the warehouse had no privacy if there was nothing private. The relationship between the claimant bank and the owner of the warehouse cannot be denied by the owner having a certain amount of stock in his warehouse and the way he returns it to the bank in his warehouse or his designated person. ? In the event of any shortfall, the owner of the warehouse was responsible for such reduction and was responsible for the loss and damage to the stock held by the owner of the warehouse. The owner of their warehouse was responsible for paying these damages because of the negligence on the stock they held in their warehouse. best advocate from Chak Sheza lawyer