Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH EJAZ AHMAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 6868 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 510 Establishment of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's Ordinance (XVX 2000), Sections 9 and 11 were charged with confiscation and possession of a vehicle. The forensic science obtained in the device was paid on the basis of laboratory reports. His chassis number is shown by the police to tamper with and does not match the number as listed in the import and registration documents. Such evidence was inconclusive in the evidence as such laboratory was not notified under Section 510, CR PC. Before using such a report in evidence, the vehicle inspector, the report's counseling officer, should have been summoned for cross inspection; the adjusting officer ordered release of the vehicle upon payment of duty, taxes and penalties. Provided that the vehicle was not available in case of theft. For a re-examination of its chase number and the reason set forth under section 168 (2) of the Customs Act, 1969, the justification must first be established, even if the vehicle was legally imported. Either illegally and was also paid duty. Or if non-duty is paid, due to the vehicle unavailability, an independent test from the independent laboratory for re-validation of its chase number was not possible. And tested, signed / countered test reports along with the officers, who had previously submitted the vehicle to the laboratory for testing to record their evidence. famous high court advocate from Pannu aqil lawyer