Find a Lawyer

MALIK TANVEER ALI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 154 and 65 Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Complaint / Reviewer on service notice denied service of notice under section 65 of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 As indicated that on return and all other correspondence, the complainant / reviewer's signature was in Urdu, the notice was signed in English and the accuracy of the notice under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance. I was drafted into writing in 1979. Such deception leaves the whole process of litigation and prosecution with a bad and unlawful purpose that frustrates the whole process. The entire process suffered misconduct, bad faith and financial loss as soon as the notice served fraud, the proceedings became obsolete and federal tax ombudsman had the authority to investigate and provide relief to the Federal Tax Ombudsman 122A of the Resort Recommended Income Tax Ordinance 2001, Canceling Stable Extra Diagnostic Order 1999 in relation to the years of review and 2000 and 2001 2001 and the retaliation proceedings against the notice server for counterfeiting of different person's signatures Begun although earlier notices were presented. On behalf of the complainant, showing that he personally knows and knows the complainant \ r \ n us immigration advocates from Punch lawyer