Find a Lawyer

ZUBAIR versus STATE

The plaintiffs' claim for section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract was that they had purchased a suite property consisting of 24 flats, of which 12 flats were vacant and 12 flats were occupied by the tenants. Advance money paid, while the remaining amount was the terms of the contract to be paid at the time the physical possession of the suit property was handed over to them - the defendants were avoiding it and they demanded more money, which agreed. The defendants did not acknowledge the agreement, the execution of the receipt. In advance, he had previously claimed that the plaintiffs had failed to consider the balance sale and, through a second notice, the plaintiffs had demanded the vacant possession of 24 flats, which was contrary to the terms of the agreement. Further emphasized that, to the extent of the time, the agreement was the essence, while the defendants never presented a consensus that Nce demanded more time than the consensus between the money and the parties, the defendants declined. That the plaintiffs were demanded of any additional money by them on the basis of which the suit was prepared. I think that Eden and the claimant's ability to comply. The precondition for the deal depended on their own admission in which they acknowledged that they did not need the money in their bank account nor a fixed order was created by the due date. Nor was any arrangement made in relation to the execution of the written agreement. Respect the intention of the parties, with specific conditions for making time as the essence of the contract list of advocates from Shemier lawyer