BROOKE BOND PAKISTAN LTD versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ
O IX, R 13 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Ex-Orders, Placing the Colonization on Delay, Plaintiff intentionally absent from the trial court and did not contact her lawyer who The case has been present for almost ten years and what. Do not file a written statement After the defendant's counsel relinquished power, fresh notice was given to him, after which two lawyers filed a lawyer but they did not appear, but the trial court against the plaintiff passed the verdict, Accuracy trial was correctly pronounced against the defendant and the verdict will not be called any case against the defendant, who did not present any evidence under which the delay of each on his long absence. And each was to be considered for the benefit of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908, the High Court decided. TM refused the request and approved the decree against the defendant was excluded in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Kunjah lawyer
