Find a Lawyer

SYED MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE SHAH versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Arts 199, 4 and 25 Constitutional Petition Civil Service Orderly Allowance Interim Petitioner, who was granted BPS 20 on 31 5 1994 and BPS 21 from 10 12 1999, from his duties till 2 February 2002 in the said salary. Retired when he retired from the compensation orderly. However, the authorities rejected the allowance from the applicant, stating that the allowance is acceptable for officers who have been doing similar work on their regular pay prior to retirement. Secondly, it was permissible for the officers working in the Punjab Secretariat to submit that the petitioner had issued orders in the premises that the act of the authorities was discriminatory, which was controversial to the effect of ignoring equal treatment. Working in the Punjab Secretariat, it was merely stated that the criteria for demanding allowance was to be in the grade of 20 or above; there could be no legal difference between the Secretariat and the non-Secretariat employees; I was assigned duties and employees of the Punjab Civil Secretariat were drawing in sequence. The allowance, while performing their duties in the same grade, was not allowed in any way between the Secretariat employees and the non-Secretariat employees; granting an order allowance to an officer in BPS 20 working in the Punjab Civil Secretariat. And after refusing to allow, no discrimination was allowed between secretarial employees and non-secretarial employees. For the non-secretarial officer in the same secretary. Refusing to allow the applicant, under the circumstances, discrimination against the Arts 4 and 25 of the Constitution jobs for advocates from Jaranwala lawyer