Find a Lawyer

SYED HUSSAIN ASIF versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of sections 9, 56, 13 (1) (AA) and 143B Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Section 2 (3) re-evaluation of refund was completed on nil revenue but not payment. Credit was not allowed for IT-30 form excuse for payment invoice validation and the other party was fully aware of the payment by the complainant / reviewer regarding the investigation of the department property as demanded in the reminder later. Reduced in credit No credit was allowed Legal justification that is offensive \ Recovery error ref promise to return refund by the Complaint / Applicant The response to Gaan's requests was not confirmed, he could not resolve the issues within a period of about three and a half years. Without any valid justification, there should be no further delays delayed to meet future tax liabilities to allow payment credits and consequent refunds to be issued. The Federal Tax Ombudsman recommends that the Central Board of Revenue officer be instructed to decide on the complainant's claim for ref for for year within thirty days \ r \ n divorce advocates from Sanghi lawyer