ZAHID HABIB versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SECRETARY REVENUE DIVISION/CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, IS
A copy of the order passed on the application for the application of the application to the Council for persons responsible for the decision of section 47 and A. XXI, R 10, was kept in the record and it was submitted that the decision And the instructions in the order have been fully complied with and implemented. The question regarding the validity of its purpose is whether the order was rightly or wrongly sanctioned, could not be acted upon in the request for execution, and in this regard the order was to be provided only under the relevant law. Other forums may have already dealt with the offense that the application for execution was dealt with in the above terms. According to the law, Coun's lawyer, who was accused of liberty to order the question, said that he did not want to file an application, he was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Phagwar lawyer
