ABDUL SATTAR versus MUREED
The controversial registered sale deadline suit confirms the cancellation of the plaintiff's modification of Articles 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Sections 79, 115 and O XXVII, R1. The order was presented as a party to the High Court in the review filed by the defendants under the Decree for non-implementation of the government by the courts. A civil judge cannot be challenged to take over the government because such an objection was not raised before the parties before the merger of the appellate court with the order of the civil judge, under whose jurisdiction such The matter was not in dispute for settlement. The Revenue Officer shall not be required to be formally set aside, void and without jurisdiction; the High Court has dismissed the request for review in the circumstances. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from FR DI Khan lawyer