RAFIQUE CENTRE, GOJRA versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Sections 59, 62 and 63 constitute the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), selection of matter for Section 9 and 11 self-assessment total audits by property of the tax officer denied by the contractual commissioner. The refusal to accept the amended filing of the Income Tax and Tax Bar Association validation was not a legal force in such an agreement because there was a valuation issue between the taxpayers and the tax revenue officer, the taxpayer told the Tax Bar Association representative. No such authority was allowed to enter into such agreement; the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax was not the Assessment Authority. , Assessment was not required to be completed in accordance with the provisions of Sections 59, 62 or 63 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, nor was CBR canceled on the basis of a blanket agreement covering all taxpayers. The taxation officer was unable to stop any corruption by the Federal Tax Ombudsman in this case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Muridkay lawyer