HAJI ALLAH DINO ZINDPUR versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU SINDH THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL
Evidence of further inquiry into the record has proved that the National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 9 and 10 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Guarantee, the record have proved that none other than the accused on the relevant date. And the place was deployed. The objectionable document, the signature and signatures found on the Form H, the one mentioned in the FIR, was not sent to the handwriting expert to confirm that the land in question was legally ordered by the Deputy Commissioner. Was canceled and is also registered. The National Accountability Bureau, built on Form II, failed to cite a witness who testified that on the relevant date the suspect was posted to another place of work, an old man, who retired in the year 2000. And the land was still occupied. In a government case against an accused seeking further inquiry, he was entitled to a discount on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
