Find a Lawyer

TAJ MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Definition of Evidence The departure entry of the excise staff indicated the time of departure at 8 am, but the same entry also included arrest of the accused and recovery of the prohibited item as per its application. It was 10 00. I said that the entry belied the prosecution's story because the entry was either thought or done with the intention of dishonestly to benefit the accused. The investigating officer honestly did not investigate the matter, both of the prosecution Material contradictions between the deployment of witnesses were in the oil. The tanker from which the ban was recovered was not sufficient to link it to the crime, unless the prosecutor could deliver material that proves that he has knowledge of the articles contained in the oil tanker. Was in view of the evidence. Failure to prove that the suspect was aware of the prohibited articles The suspect was not found to be the owner of the oil Tanker said both factors are sufficient to prove that the evidence of both the prosecution witnesses was not faith-based and that The material contradiction, which should be given to the accused, was based on the evidence of the prosecution's story, although it was material contradictions and reliance on evidence that was not legal to prosecute the suspect. The benefit was given to the accused and he was directed to be released property advocate from Pir Mahal lawyer