Find a Lawyer

MRS. ALBA D\'SA versus MRS. NAHEED PABANI

Section & 42 & Sindh 54 Sindh Buildings Control Authority Ordinance (v. 1979), Sections 2 & 21 Karachi Buildings Control & Town Planning Regulations, 2002, Rules 24, 25 & 26 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4 & 23 Convention Evidence (10) (1984), Article 129 (e) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XXXX, RR 1 and 2 Interim injunctions, balance of multi-storey building construction, irreparable damage and evidence of preliminary nature of the property. Right to Acquisition and Protection of Rights The plaintiffs' complaint was that the defendants were illegally taking up buildings that undermined their easement rights. Oops. Authorities enjoying the powers under the Sindh Buildings Control Authority Ordinance 1979 Read ations with the Karachi Buildings Control and Town Planning Regulation, 2002 being the owner of the defendant plot of property guaranteed under Articles 4 and 23 of the Constitution. Acquired the fundamental rights to hold and enjoy the rights, in favor of the rights, confidentiality and peaceful enjoyment of the plaintiffs, in the protection of the fundamental rights of the defendants did not infringe or infringe the proprietary rights of their plots. As canon testimony, taken under Article 129 (e) of 1984, that the official The speeches were made regularly, all disputes raised by the plaintiffs need a deep appreciation of the evidence that can be properly made. The educational evaluation of the material available at the time of record showed that there was no first case in favor of the plaintiff, the balance was not in favor of the plaintiffs as it would be a great inconvenience for the defendants to own the property. According to the law, their c Pakistan, top advocate family court from Khoski lawyer