MUHAMMAD AKRAM NADEEM versus STATE
Section 497 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Section 14 (c) bail, grant of the High Court, while rejecting the accused's second bail, the trial court ordered that the trial be held within the legal period. Needed, but it was not complied with. The case of the accused was related to the case of those who misused government funds. Throughout the reference, no allegation was made against the accused that he misused one pie belonging to the government or He misused his authority during his time. Services from Grade 6 to Grade 9 were rejected on two of the two bail pleas - even though only two non-material witnesses were examined, while the material witnesses were not presented to the court by prosecution. Because of what he knew. Where appropriate, the accused should be granted bail, the accused released on bail \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Zhob lawyer
