RAWAT ALI JAMIL versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND MEDIA DEVELOPMENT, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD
Section 11 provides for a basic rule, FR 22, and the 22A Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 defining payment to a civil servant and acquiring allowances, etc. Service Tribunal Appellant, who services in BS. Were appealing to them. 16, was declared a surplus and was subsequently assigned to the Pakistan Railway in BS 11 because there was no BS 16 post in the Pakistan Railway which he could absorb and the appellant volunteered. Accepted that under Section 11A the appellant's selection process was issued. His salaries were secured by BSR16 through the Civil Servants Act 1973 and FR22, but authorities violated the provisions of the law, saying that his salary was not fixed accordingly. Is going The salary in BS11 was not in the record to show that the appellant was forced to accept a lower post in BS11 instead of BS16. The controversial question was not raised. The BS16 payment was prepared by the appellant Pliya as the authorities but it was that under FR22 it was the appellant's salaried salary which was to be protected and it was covered by the House Allowance and the Convention. The allowance was not included in the payroll. The salary determination statement will entitle the appellant to his current position of BS 11 in the House Allowance and Concession Allowance since the authorities have already secured sufficient salary, so the appellant through the appellant He resigned from the post
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
