Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

versus


As per the requirement for tax filing on section 50 (4) 25 6 2004, tax deduction on source notes was made by fax and circle inspector but nowhere is it mentioned to deal with the provincial government secretary finance as they The person does not accumulate the amount retained as service charges to compel the applicant to pay for the entire exercise, so as to achieve the target annual budget, the provisions of section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Not only was the appellant responsible for the act. Ordinance, 1979 But this Appellant could not be considered defaulter as the duty to deduct / submit tax was fulfilled and the Appellant was wrongly considered as responsible person for tax deduction under Section 50 (4). Was. ) The order for both the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 forums was not maintained and was canceled by the Appellate Tribunal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
solicitors from Ludhan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.