KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION LTD versus NOOR IRON AND STEEL INDUSTRIES LTD
Section 54 54 The case for the defendant's submission to recover the sum was that according to the decision of the Electric Inspector who made the payment through a payment order, on the date of which 12 12 1987 on the other hand, the lawyer for the plaintiff. Had stated that the salary was of Order 17. 198 1983 Defendant's counsel claimed that the date of the pay order was 12 12, 1987, in which the electric inspector determined the correct amount according to his decision, the electrical inspector's decision was taken by the plaintiff and the electric inspector's There was no further action without the front. The matter, which was filed before the High Court's Electric Inspector Division Bench decision, was referred to the Electric Inspector for a special decision and the verdict was given. And as the defendant claims, the payment was made according to the judgment, the suit went unchallenged, which, however, would not prejudice the plaintiff's right to question the claim that the pay order date was 17 12 1983. Was.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Bhan Saeedabad lawyer