Find a Lawyer

JASEEM versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) / 34 34 Definition of evidence The reduction of the benefit of the doubt was not disputed by the defense merely on the defendant's statement of the prosecution's testimony on the recovery of the weapon of the crime and its identification by the prosecution's witnesses, It was submitted that he could not see the knife. The timing of the incident due to darkness, the statement of the recovered witness, who was an independent witness who did not have an intimate relationship with the complaining party, cannot be dismissed. The evidence presented by the prosecution with the proper admission of the accused proved the crime. The accused, separating the case of the two accomplices, claimed by the lawyer that although it was said that the accused were named as persons, who, on the basis of incitement of the main accused to the victim, stabbed him. The victim was apprehended but had no specific name. Regarding the person who apprehended the deceased, the statement that the main accused called his brother to arrest the accused was found to be easy, which was weak evidence to prove and punish the co-accused. The evidence did not clarify whether the co-accused provided any assistance to the main suspect or whether the incident was a pre-determined incident because the PPC speaks of criminal activity through Article 34 records of joint intent. The persons forwarding it showed that apart from the complainant's statement that the main accused was going to his house to fetch a knife, the co-accused was directed to apprehend the deceased, with no direct evidence against the co-accused. Was not present on the record, which indicates that he had an F in the commission of the crime best advocate from Chitral lawyer