NAFEES KHAN versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
The Appeal Employee was removed from the Sections 3, 5 and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), section 4, after issuing a notice that he was almost unofficially absent from duty. Stay. A half-month appellant has sent a letter to the director of the employer's medical center stating that he may not be on duty for a related period due to serious domestic problems. The appellant also requested that leave be granted for the period although the inquiry was not made. Against the appellant, but since the appellant himself acknowledged the fact of absence from duty, despite the fact that he remained absent despite the domestic issues, the inquiry, if no further result was obtained, Inquiries, in the circumstances, would have been useless and unnecessary exercise to determine the fact of presence if there was no reason for the competent authority to interfere with the proceedings, less than two months after the appellant was removed from service. To be absent from duty for a job id. And also for some serious domestic abuse like Because of the relationships stated by the appellant, it was very strict that even a lesser sentence of less than two steps for two years would be sufficient, in which case the appellant would be restored to the position from which he was given. Was removed. The leave of absence due to the appellant will be considered as leave. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Bhuawana lawyer