Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD EJAZ versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 376 bail, further inquiry into the grant of the accused, it was claimed that he was wrongly implicated in this case because of a dispute because the complainant was the accused The father was a tenant. Although he did not appeal to common sense, though the suspect was allegedly snatched from the victim at gunpoint for allegedly having a densely populated area, the complaint allegedly raised by the affected girl There was no body of the public, but the prosecution's story is suspicious; the medical report does not support allegations of forcible adultery because no bleeding was found, though the victim has been accused of being a virgin. According to the complainant. The victim was beaten to her house by someone else, not the accused and the victim's statement was suspicious because according to the complainant, the victim was called by another person, but the victim girl has stated that after the adultery commission she was attacked. She became unconscious and regained consciousness at her home. The accused's confession was that further inquiries were sought in this case even though the accused was opposed to the bail approval, but he did not succeed in confirming the submissions made by the accused's lawyer. There was no power by the lawyer without the accused and they made the accused's case a further investigation, making him entitled to bail. famous high court advocate from Sambrial lawyer