GHULAM NABI SHAIKH versus PAKISTAN EMPLOYEES' COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, P.E.C.H.S., KARACHI
O. IX, R 8 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12, 42 and 54 of the Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 of the High Court Appeal Suit Declaration, Permanent Order Dismissal, Occupation and Loss Was not closed. The suspension of the plaintiff and his witnesses' testimony and the matter was adjourned for the evidence of the defendant The petition was requested by the plaintiff to withdraw his order, it was guaranteed that No further postponement will be allowed in this case and the matter has been adjourned. The plaintiff's hearing date and her witnesses were caught in traffic and could not appear in court on time, and the petition for adjournment of the plaintiff was dismissed and the case dismissed for illegal prosecution, on examination of the records. It appears that there was no defective order favoring decision-making on the merits of the law as per the law, traffic was stopped on the relevant date due to the VIP Movement, in which the plaintiff presented evidence. , But he said that the parties' rights to be involved were denied, due to the evidence presented by the parties. Nyad this case should be decided on and allowed the appeal and ordered a separate, have been sent to the trial court to record the parties to the trial evidence. Within a fixed period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Machh lawyer
