versus
Section 156 Crimes Convicted for confiscating a vehicle without obtaining expert opinion from a science-related laboratory of crime to confirm that the chase number of the vehicle was not real / real, to know that the vehicle was franzic Should have been examined by the science laboratory. Whether or not the chassis number found on the vehicle was genuine but the department failed to establish that the chase number was not genuine. ? The vehicle shown in the auction voucher was a Hano truck, while the undercarriage / prime mover machine was not overweight because both of these terms were generally used for such vehicles and in the absence of solid evidence / evidence that the chassis. No. The vehicle was not genuine, such an argument was not enforceable The order found legality or weakness which was maintained by the appellate tribunal and the appeal was dismissed without merit. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Head Marala lawyer