versus
Section 156 Crimes of crime were confiscated on the basis that the chassis number itself was punched / grinded without examination from the Forensic Science Laboratory. The whole matter of the department was based on the premise that the chassis number itself was cut / grinded and auctioned by the vehicle. Vehicle owners supported their argument that the auction was the one that was not purchased, while the chassis of the car according to the manufacturing company's certificate was manually stamped on their plant and in the past In such a situation, even with or without the incomplete model number, the vehicle tested by the Franz Science Laboratory should determine if the chassis number found on the vehicle was genuine or not. I failed that the chassis number was not genuine because the vehicle is auctioned. The truck shown in the auction voucher was, however, the car n prime mover machine in Quito was not overweight as these two terms were commonly used for such vehicles and in the absence of solid evidence / proof that the car's chassis. The number was not genuine, this argument was not a viable order of the first appellate authority, was affirmed in connection with the release of the vehicle and the appellate tribunal dismissed the appeal as being without merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Bannu lawyer