Find a Lawyer

GADOON TEXTILE MILLS LTD., INDUSTRIAL ESTATE GADOON AMAZAI, TEHSIL AND DISTRICT SWABI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE, DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Establishment of the Office of the Sections 1 (3) and 3D (3) Section RO (I) / 99 Dated 1 7 1999 and Section R805 (I) / 99 Dated 15 7 1999 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 ()) (i) (a) Implementation of excise duty The return of excise duty was levied against the manufacturers of Goodon Emazee by Section R (I) 99 and withdrew by Section RO 805. ? I) / 99, dated 15 7 1999 to 1999 1999, the complainant had submitted Rs.1,00,000 in advance and his return request was accepted to the extent of Rs 19,780 and claim of Rs 80,219. Was rejected Consumers did not approve Complainant presented documentary evidence, which was a government document that did not include sales excise duty paid sales tax purposes for invoice invoices. The names of the clients involved were those who were involved in dismissing the claim without hearing the document. The affidavits of the law were arbitrary, the decision was made arbitrarily and solely on speculation, not on the evidence on record, the Ombudsman ordered that a refund of Rs 30,219 be paid within 30 days. online advocate from Thari Mirwah lawyer