Find a Lawyer

YAQOOB AHMED versus MST. SHAISTA

Article 17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of juvenile detention After the trial court and the appellate court handed over the custody of the minor's mother, the father of the minor challenged the constitutional petition for custody of the adjudicator. Consideration for Determination Because of their welfare, the court also had to consider them before handing over their mother or father, to consider the welfare of minors, the evidence available on record. Was to be considered by the court. Living in a rented house in the Commonwealth; he operated an out-of-home electric shop in connection with his work, and his parents were not living, and he was living with his two married brothers, who It was shown that no one was available to care for the minor in her home. They can be cared for and cared for and nurtured by those who are the true mothers of minors. Records have shown that the well-being of inferior children with their mother, who is a natural guardian, can love and sustain minors more than others. In the case of her son until the age of majority and marriage as a daughter, it was the basic duty of the father of the minor to provide for the care of his minor children, in the absence of funds or in the absence of the mother. She should not be treated as disqualified if she refuses to take custody of her children. In their welfare only the consent of the minor was to be considered, if the minor was old enough to make it a priority, but in the present case the minor. law firms from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer