Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR THROUGH MUHAMMAD ALEEM KHAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 18 of the Imports and Export Control Act, 1950 (NXNXX) of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000V of XV), by the customs authorities for payment of section 2 (3) goods. Excise and to no object certificate N (NOC) were issued. The Department of Tax Revenue, despite the payment of duty by the seller for the purpose of transferring the vehicle in the name of the buyer / complainant, on the basis that the vehicles were imported under the temporary import scheme even after seven years had passed. To allow the Central Board of Revenue to maintain goods, the Central Board of Revenue allowed vehicles to be maintained on payment of duty and taxes, without any prejudice under the Import and Export Control Act, 1950 Was granted, the Central Board of Revenue was not allowed to sell as a result. Otherwise, instead of referring the customs authorities, the complainant should have asked the seller to obtain any objection, on the certificate under the Import and Export Control Act, 1950, even after payment of duty and the names of the importers. It was necessary to obtain the permission of the Ministry of Commerce for the transfer of the vehicle and the importer or complainant should contact the Ministry of Commerce. If this is the case then it was necessary to obtain an invalid certificate from the Ministry of Commerce. Should have been told about this when he first applied for the collector matter but a n Randaz, indifference, incompetence and inefficiency due to possible delay, no decision was taken more than seven years in administration duties attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mandi Faizabad lawyer