Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE


The filing of Section 173 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302 Challan Trial Court was not yet charged and the report was entertained only under Section 173, CR PC, in this case Article 1773, CR P.C. Under the report could not be entertaining. The favorable assumption that the charge will be computed under a particular section, especially when the court has not yet examined the material for the purpose of compiling the charge report under section 73 under73, is to provide information and materials to the police. Was submitted to CPC. Under this law, the court was able to initiate the trial of the accused on the basis of an interim report under section 173; the CCP trial court was also capable of charging on the basis of interim report. But since the police had not yet incorporated the medical officer's opinion in his report, then if the court had charged him under section 2302, PPC, he would not have faced a dispute through litigation / accused. Could have done.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
divorce advocates from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.