Find a Lawyer

QUALITY WEAVING MILLS LTD., MULTAN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 195C and 19 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Section RO 962 (I) / 90 Dated 12 9 1990 Sec RO 722 (I) / 89 exempted from alternative dispute resolution Authorized Customs Duty Textile Knitting Machinery imports taxes and penalties for the violation of the provisions of section RO722 (I) / 89, with the exception of customs duty, customs surcharge and other taxes, with section RO962 (I) / 90. Was attached dated 12.09 1990 under Textile unit attached order was actually rejected appeal against the order was submitted before the Secretary, the Finance Division filed the writ petition. Bourgeois complainant delayed, the High Court directed the detainer to stay within a period of four months, on the basis that the decision of the customs, central excise and sales tax appellate tribunal resulted in the review of the federal government. The options have been withdrawn, the jurisdiction has not been delayed until the federal government has the authority to decide on the review petitions under Section 196 of the Customs Act, 1969 High Court, he said, finally in writing. Observations were made and according to the administrative capacity of the Secretary, Finance Division, the inspections took place Not guaranteed. The High Court, which can be requested by the party or the parties through a fresh request, complains that the complainant transferred the complaint that it did not have the financial resources to pursue the matter before the complainant regarding the accuracy of the High Court. Closed vertically and horizontally from one option to another, though there are clear discrimination and strong support for this case legally. best law firms from Swabi lawyer