Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASGHAR versus STATE

Section 2302 (b) Definition of Evidence Sentencing, Reduction in Reduction Conditions Two versions Suddenly the matter was not disputed in the presence of time and the incident and the presence of the parties was the father of the accused and his cause of death The prosecutor alleged that the suspect killed Casey for his death, while the defense version was that during the couple's death, the deceased was lying on the ground and was killed. Injury was not a professional move, but it was a sudden matter. After equipping myself with Kasi, it did not come to its place. Because of the harsh words exchanged, he was suddenly subjected to continuity, the accused took Casey off the spot and at the same time killed him in the wounded. Something unpleasant happened between the parties that led to the death of the accused, witnesses did not see. The first part of the incident, therefore, he was not in a position to state that there was frustration with what had happened between the parties shortly before the incident, which apparently led to the victim's daughter, the accused's wife. Was not sent. Along with this, such facts were sufficient to show that the sentence of life imprisonment for any of them was diminishing, while justifying the death penalty. The High Court had sentenced the trial court, but it had allowed the appeal of the death sentence to be imposed. patent advocate from Taxila lawyer