Find a Lawyer

ABDUL SATTAR versus ADDITIONAL INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLCIE (INVESTIGATION), PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 18 (6) of the Constitution of the Constitution (XLV of 1860), section 440/342/337 L (2) / 148/149 of the General Clause Act (X9 of 1897), section 24A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition investigation Changes to the Complainant's request The District Standing Board recommended a change in the investigation of the case, but instead of submitting an investigation to a police officer of the Additional Inspector General of Police (Investigation), the aforementioned recommendation was filed on this basis. Whether the District Standing Board has given no concrete or strong reason for the change in the investigation, there is no doubt as to what Article 18 (6) envisages as the Police Order, 2002 I have been the head of all inquiries through the Additional Inspector General of Police (Investigation), but the interpretation of Article 18 (6) of the Police Order, 2002, in the law maintained by it if the recommendation of the District Standing Board is of any value or If there is no value, then there is no need for law to be set up for the formation of the said board, and the above interpretation was an attempt to defeat the wisdom of the legislature, which is a way to avoid a lot of scrutiny. Procedure was provided if the board did not approve a speaking order or if there was any coercion or change in the investigation Dew is not understood. Thereafter, the police officer should have referred the matter to the District Standing Board for reconsideration and to pass a speech order, as provided under section 24A of the General Clauses Act, 1897, Accordingly, each authority was obliged to approve the speech and appropriate reasonable order if the above interpretation of the police officer was accepted and the final change was made to his discretion. top advocate from Gilgit lawyer