Find a Lawyer

TOP END PRODUCTIONS, LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 170, Sections 96, 102, 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance (1979) and sections of the 52A Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), 2 (3) CBR Circular No. 5 / 2003 dated 30 6 2003 The return of the return was not issued on the basis that the tax deduction party had late submission to the public account which complies with the legal requirements for submission within 7 days of the deduction. Was not passed and in this regard the challan indicates payment under section 5A and not the section 50 ()) Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 1979 1979 Validation withholding tax related to the complainant / reviewer. The details paid with Yagi challan show that it was written on the 52A word, with the excuse for insisting that the payment was under section 52A and not the Income Tax Ordinance, section 50 of 1979 ( 4) Under the section on which the payment was made, there was no column on the proposed challan form and it was illogical to assume that the payment was through a withholding agent. They have their own account and not for the parties whose names were explicitly listed in the column for payment details which can be verified with the holding agent from Section 52A of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which is deducted from the tax Went and was inconsistent in the present context as neither the complainant / reviewer nor the holding agent was required to pay, under Section 52A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, to submit a taxable amount. The delay should be attributed to and withholding from the Withholding Agent. Taken under section 86 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 Ref immigration advocates from Haripur lawyer