Find a Lawyer

RANA MANZOOR HUSSAIN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 57, 7 (1) and 2 (14) of the Sales Tax Act (III of 1951), Sections 27 (1) and 2 (12) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 194b (2) of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Awarded Complainant regarding establishment of office (2000 of XXXV), Section 2 (3) of CBR Order C No. 7 (7) C&I / 84, correction of clerical errors, dated 25 11 1984, etc. Moved a petition to the Central Board of Revenue to file a case against the reviewer. It is decided by the appellate tribunal to make amends under the provisions of section 57 of the Sales Tax Act 1990 as the appellate tribunal had the power to remedy the errors. The case should be reopened after the appellate tribunal's order to recover the amount already paid. So that his reward can be paid under the award order. This department did not appeal the appellate tribunal's decision and, in the petition submitted to the complainant for payment of reward, claimed that the federal tax ombudsman's jurisdiction extended the federal appellate tribunal's federal tax. Was not done The Ombudsman Forum was unable to review or comment on the appellate tribunal's order as to whether the appellate tribunal had passed its order under the provisions of the Sales Tax Act 1990, nor did it constitute a ground under the provisions of the Sales Tax Act 1951. Is. Appeal to the High Court was not available for filing, nor was any appellate tribunal requiring record correction to be disclosed, assuming that the complainant accepted the failure of the case against the Central Board of Revenue. Could not have been granted special approval. Merit Services Services Eng list of supreme court advocates from Hangu lawyer