Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHIR ALIAS SHANI versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE (II), PATTOKI, DISTRICT KASUR

The Appellate Tribunal granted the applicants permission to re-apply for a cross-examination of the Section 540 Preamble Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302, for a doctor to be re-cross-examined. It was inspected that the doctor did not provide a final statement. In the same shooting that resulted in five injuries to the victim, the trial court saw the prosecutor's interest in putting the court questions before the doctor, which clearly stated that he had tracked Was not mentioned. The doctor presented in the bullet post-mortem report did not testify to the incident because of his professionalism; of course, a bullet case ruled out the possibility of recovering all the injured. The trial court will decide after considering the entire evidence, including the ocular testimony, the post-mortem report, the picture drawing on it. The trial of the doctor's contradictory opinion on his examination, his cross-examination, and the question of the court in response to it will not be considered in isolation at the relevant time by the trial court, during his examination and cross-examination. He has given a detailed statement. Examining and re-examining the law will be nothing but a misuse of the process and time wasted. Also, if such practice is allowed, no criminal case will be terminated, as the criminal In cases where medical experts often make such statements when cross-examined, in addition, the complainant's lawyer failed to show that the witness testified again. online advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer