MUHAMMAD YOUNUS versus STATE
Article 4 Q Qualified evidence (10 December 1984 1984 1984), Article Confidential statement of accused accused, recording of magistrate's failure to introduce magistrate failure of magistrate, to inform the accused He was presented to them to record the confessional statement, was not obliged to record, and in the case, he was inclined to record such statement, then used it as evidence against him. Can be done And if he recorded a confessional statement or not, he would not be re-sent to police custody; the magistrate's failure would be to examine the body of the accused to ascertain whether the police tortured him. Whether or not his confession to extract his confessional statement, without fulfilling all such requirements by the magistrate and upon completion of the reflection period, the accused will have no legal sanctity and cannot be relied on in principle.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Mandra lawyer