Find a Lawyer

TOP END PRODUCTIONS, LAHORE versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 122 (5A) Income Tax Ordinance (XXII of 1979) Sections 9, 59 (1), 50 (4) and 80C Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 XXVI), Section 2 (3) Self-Assessment Assessment of Refunds was engaged in obtaining airtime from PTV Returns and ordering TV drama preparation and exhibits to be ordered for total audit federal tax ombudsman, Self Assessment The return order was approved under the scheme, resulting in the return recommended by the Federal Tax Ombudsman on the basis of the return notice after the verification notice under Section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 PTA drama was broadcast on TV by the time of the purchase agreement of the income under the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 was able to tax under section 80 c. There was a misconception in the termination of the tax registry that it was wrong to discriminate against the interests of the tax. The decision of the Commissioner and the same Commissioner has now been claimed that filing returns under the Self Assessment Scheme was inappropriate and should have been filed under Section 143B of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, which was contradictory. Initially, the Commissioner identified some points in addition to the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax to recommend its arrangement, which was wrongly examined for return. A change of opinion cannot be justified in favor of Section 122A of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001, by the Federal Tax Ombudsman, which leaves no room for suspicion of misunderstanding in proceedings. ? Evidence that the refusal to proceed under Section 122 (5A) of the Tax Ordinance 2001 famous supreme court advocate from Ali Chak lawyer