BADARUDDIN ALIAS MAJID SHAH versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 392 and 397 bail, was the only identification parade the prosecution had against the defendants for further investigation, which was delayed approximately six and a half months after the incident. Held. And nine days after the arrest of the accused, the accused was already detained in the police station in other criminal cases when the complainant went to the police station and it is likely that the accused was identified by the complainant and the prosecution witnesses. Was shown. The parade otherwise faced natural flaws, the case of the accused was further investigated in these circumstances and the unlawful delay, the accused was arrested, he was entitled to bail
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Kasur lawyer
