Find a Lawyer

KHALID MEHMOOD versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF PAKISTAN RAILWAYS POLICE, LAHORE

Articles 10 (3) and 112 of the Pakistan Railway Police Rules, 1980, R133 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Probationers Appeal for terminating the services of appellants, which is the probationers section of the Pakistan Railway Police. Nominated / Nominated A Section I Appellant's Probationer Class Completed the course while participating in the course, but failed the exam and their services were referred to Police Order, 2002, A, B, C, Article 10 (3) of the course. Order 14 issued under Canceled Order was canceled. Applicants did not successfully complete courses A&B after successful completion of the relevant probationary school course Appellant's Closing Order could not be approved without notice, they were rejected in a section. After his recruitment he was able to thwart the probationers (intermediate school courses) in which their services could be terminated under the Pakistan Railway Police Rules, 19 KR 133. 80 said that disqualifying the probationers course would prove to be the ground for any action under R133 of the Pakistan Railway Police Rules 1980, in which case notice was not required to provide any reason as the probationer's course was not confirmed. Was due. Appellants in the service, however, were rescued by an unusual delay in attending a probationer class course, which delayed designating them, due to a lack of time for authorities to prepare for such neglect. Influenced their chances of successfully passing the course. Appellants with considerable delay cannot be ignored due to poor performance of appellants in the probationer course, as special registration advocate from Burewala lawyer